Valvojat: Borrelioosiyhdistys, Bb, Jatta1001

Vastaa Viestiin
Viestit: 3151
Liittynyt: Ke Tammi 21, 2009 14:16


Viesti Kirjoittaja soijuv » To Huhti 29, 2010 12:07

Ihmiset ovat alkaneet vaatia selkeää tietoa lääkäreiden ja lääketeollisuuden välisistä kytköksistä sillä ne voivat vaikuttaa suuresti esim. hoitosuosituksiin. Tutkimuksien mukaan (20 kpl) lääkäreiden henkilökohtaisia kytköksiä lääkeyhtiöihin ei pidetä hyväksyttävinä. Kyselyissä suurin osa vastanneista piti esim. lääkeyhtiöiden pieniäkin lahjoja, kuten ilmaisia aterioita, vastuuttomina. Ihmisten mielestä tällaiset kytkökset heikentävät hoidon laatua ja lisäävät hoitokustannuksia. Nyt vaaditaan että hallitukset estävät lailla tällaiset kytkökset. (Yalen lääketieteellinen tiedekunta 2010)

Suom.huom. Suomessa toimii järjestö Lääkärit ilman sponsoreita ry.

When It Comes to Doctors? Ties to Drug Companies, Patients Want Transparency

By Yale School of Medicine
Apr 27, 2010 - 5:08:02 PM

(HealthNewsDigest.com) - New Haven, Conn. ? Most patients and research subjects believe that the financial ties their clinicians and researchers have with private companies should be disclosed, according to findings published in Archives of Internal Medicine by researchers at Yale School of Medicine.

?Financial ties between clinicians, researchers and private companies continue to be a contentious issue among politicians, the media and physician groups,? said lead author on the study Cary Gross, M.D., associate professor of medicine at Yale School of Medicine. ?We found that patients and research subjects believe financial ties affect professional behavior.?

Gross and his colleagues systematically reviewed data from 20 surveys conducted primarily with patients. Many patients in the survey viewed physician ties to drug companies as unacceptable or inappropriate, especially when the gift or relationships is of a personal nature. For example 47-60 percent of patients thought free dinners were unacceptable, and many patients believe these ties decrease the quality of the care they receive and increase its costs.

As calls for more disclosure, including pending national legislation that would require public reporting of physician ties to companies, Gross and his team hope their work can inform this movement in a way that benefits patients.

?We hope our study will improve the design of these public reporting systems, perhaps by highlighting the kind of information patients want disclosed and shedding light on how they will think about that information,? said first author and Yale medical student Adam Licurse.

The study also provides insight on what is not well understood in the literature. ?We found few studies that asked patients how financial ties affect patients? decisions about choosing a doctor,? said Licurse. ?While many studies asked patients if they would still participate in research after learning about ties to drug companies, little is known about whether patients would be any less likely to choose a doctor if they knew about financial ties.?

Licurse said that teasing out these behavioral outcomes and answering more of the questions surrounding patient decision-making will be the next step.

Other authors on the study included Emma Barber of Yale and Steve Joffe, M.D. of Harvard.

Citation: Arch Intern Med. Vol. 170, No. 8 (April 26, 2010)

This is a very important topic given the new IDSA guidelines for the treatment of tick borne diseases, esp. lyme disease. Many of the physicians have ties to insurance companies, drug companies, etc. and are not evaluating evidence which contradicts their ineffective treament guidelines.

Vastaa Viestiin