Valvojat: Borrelioosiyhdistys, Bb, Jatta1001, Bb, Jatta1001, Borrelioosiyhdistys, Jatta1001, Borrelioosiyhdistys, Bb, Jatta1001, Borrelioosiyhdistys, Bb

Vastaa Viestiin
Viestit: 1820
Liittynyt: Ma Tammi 26, 2009 23:13


Viesti Kirjoittaja Bb » Su Helmi 15, 2009 15:11

Lähettäjä: Soijuv Lähetetty: 22.5.2008 8:26

Martijn van Duijn turhautui olemassaoleviin borrelioosikeskustelusivuihin internetissä. Hänen mielestään niistä puuttui avoin keskustelu ja väittely silloin kun ristiriitoja aiheuttavia puheenaiheita ilmaantui. "Miten lukijat pystyvät päättämään omasta näkökannastaan mikäli tietoa rajoitetaan ja estetään skeptiset kannanotot." Tältä pohjalta hän perusti englanninkielisen LymenetEurope - ja flaaminkieliset lymenet.nl -sivut. Sivuilla esitetään argumentteja esim. tieteellisistä tutkimuksista, erilaisten vaihtoehtoisten hoitojen hyvistä ja huonoista puolista, borrelioosia ympäröivästä lääketieteellisestä ja poliittisesta salamyhkäisyydestä jne.

Please go to the original article for hyperlinks that will take you to references cited.

http://lymeblog.com/modules.php?name=Ne ... e&sid=1424

International Lyme discussion group welcomes debate/critical thinking

Date: Wednesday, May 21 @ 04:00:00 EDT
LymeBlog News
Lexington, KY USA
By Rita L. Stanley, Ph.D.

Martijn van Duijn was growing increasingly frustrated with the Lyme disease discussion groups he accessed on the Internet. He felt that there was a lack of open conversation and debate when controversial topics came up, and he was concerned about the use of censorship and ridicule to stifle thorough exploration of tricky subjects.

Far too many peddlers of questionable products, services and unconventional protocols were infiltrating and directing discussions in many of the groups as well.

How could participants really decide for themselves what to think and do on sites where information was self-limited, skepticism about questionable health practices was discouraged, and dissension could be rewarded with derision, personal attacks and outright banning?

Since Lyme disease issues are steeped in controversy, Martijn saw the need for a forum that welcomed critical thinking skills where all facets of the debate could be explored, including those considered off limits elsewhere. It would be a place where you would not be banned or condemned just for disagreeing. It would keep track of the latest in science and medicine and quackery aimed at Lyme patients.

The site would be bold and encourage argument for the purpose of learning and reaching one?s own conclusions. In the end, he decided to work at developing just such a site. He actually made 2?one in Dutch and the other in English.

His English language website called LymeNet Europe began slowly last summer and is geared towards an international crowd. ?Everyone is welcome, not just Europeans? says Martijn, and he is dedicated toward not censoring dissenting or minority viewpoints. He expects posters to act like responsible adults?show self control?something he considers essential to enable productive give-and-take.

?One of the reasons is that I want a forum where people can have intelligent informative discussions and where free speech is given a high priority; but not a place that is totally unmoderated,? explains the Lyme patient who lives in Friesland, a northern province in the Netherlands.

His other website LymeNet Nederland is in the Dutch language. This article is about LymeNet Europe because of my language limitations.

Martijn has been developing his site gradually and thoughtfully over the past year. In addition to the discussion forum, it contains informative articles about Lyme disease, including scientific publications updated on a daily basis, and a recently launched LymeWiki.

Moderator Martijn

Martijn (known as Martian in the discussion forum) has been a Lyme disease sufferer since the late 1980?s following a tick bite he experienced as a child during a camping trip in the Netherlands. Since tick-borne illnesses were barely recognized in Europe at that time, the young man spent years suffering from complex disabling symptoms; the resulting social isolation and lack of compassion took their toll.

He explains about his attempts at formal higher education, ?I first tried biotechnology, but in the first year I stopped halfway. I could not keep up with it because of my bad health.

Later I was going to study biology at a university. That was in 1998, but during the preceding summer I got much worse. On top of all the symptoms I already had, I got very dizzy/lightheaded/imbalanced, got problem walking, and got terrible heart arrhythmias. I could not study at all this way.?

It took him many years to locate a physician who would diagnose him with the tick-borne illness. Martijn is concerned about the lack of physician education and general awareness in his country even though he indicates that a recent study found 23.6% of ticks evaluated were infected. Other reports show variable levels of infectivity depending on location, but increasing tick densities over time indicate that the problem is only getting worse.

Martijn found that intelligent discussion without censorship was an important part of his self education and in finding competent help for his illness. For years he posted on the Usenet group sci.med.diseases.lyme and learned much from the unfettered discourse there even though the atmosphere grew very harsh as time passed. Unfortunately in recent years, that group has become almost useless due to a few individuals who destroyed the open discourse either by design or mental instability.

So?self-taught in the computer skills needed?he started LymeNet Europe and LymeNet Nederland, sites where others with a similar outlook could gather or just lurk. He moderates the forums with a gentle but firm hand, and he lets posters know that he expects civil discourse no matter what the subject. He wants people to attack the problem and not each other; to agree to disagree.

A small band of regular posters at LymeNet Europe so far seem delighted with Martijn?s vision and give their opinions readily when asked about the site and Martijn (go here http://www.lymeneteurope.org/forum/view ... 1&p=7834to see all of their responses):

Frequent contributor Itsy notes, ?I'm interested in information, science, and healthy debate. Here, we can discuss studies. We can discuss the pros and cons of unproven or alternative treatments. We can bust one another's chops...?

Claudia states that the type of people who would find the site useful are those ?looking for objective and factual information. And those looking to understand and sort through the political and medical mess that is Lyme disease.?

Who won?t feel comfortable? ?Sheep bleating dogma or hype without having examined or thought through the facts, and those who take being challenged or questioned on their thoughts or positions as a personal insult or offence.?

?The atmosphere here is generally calm, although there are clashes sometimes among certain differences in opinions,? writes LymeEnigma. She appreciates Martian?s moderating skills that keep the board functioning well. ?Martian is a great administrator. He makes moderating look easy.?

Polls: a new feature

The discussion Forum at LymeNet Europe is divided into 8 general categories and subcategories. The topics range from science to support, but a new feature ?Polls? (subcategory of ?Support & Stuff?) gives the reader a taste of just what kind of subject matter this group is willing to tackle.( see http://www.lymeneteurope.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=14 )

Here members can submit surveys to find out what other contributors think, and the results are sure to stimulate further discussion, something this group thrives on.

For example, I recently had the idea of writing an article about the most dubious or questionable Lyme treatments. Since the group has been actively discussing many contenders, I thought they could put together a list and then vote on it to see which would come out on top. The discussion was lively about what should be put on the list, of course. Twenty treatments were decided upon and the survey results are posted under ?Most dubious/questionable Lyme disease treatments?.

At the time of this writing, the top contenders are ?salt/Vitamin C? and ?treatment advice by uncredentialed gurus or self-proclaimed experts?. When asked to clarify the latter, Claudia patiently broke the subject down into 5 categories, gave examples and sites references with URLs. She wasn?t shy about giving specifics by means. (see http://www.lymeneteurope.org/forum/view ... 7874#p7874)

Another survey asks, ?In your opinion, what is the biggest obstacle to the resolution of the Lyme controversy?? So far, the IDSA treatment guidelines, the ILADS treatment guidelines, lack of medical research and lack of viable controlled studies in humans are in a 4-way tie.

The polls are still open, so if you feel you?d like to participate in a survey?or add one?and join in on the lively debates, discussions and occasional donnybrooks, sign up to be a member.

?The only people who might want to stay away from LNE would be those looking to promote dogma, pseudoscience or other such nonsense,? says LymeEnigma.

Itsy cautions, ?It should be avoided by minors without supervision for profanity and adult themes?an ?R? rated board at times.?

But in true LymeNet Europe fashion, Yvonne disagrees and doesn?t want anyone to stay away, ?Everyone should have the opportunity to say something.?

And Hiker53 has a call out for more people to join from Europe. He?d like to find out about different treatment options available on the Continent.

Finally, while I haven?t used any of Cave76?s quotes, you?ll find her making insightful and often humorous comments throughout all topics.

You?re invited to visit, join or just lurk:

LymeNet Europe (English language): http://www.lymeneteurope.org/

LymeNet Nederland (Dutch language): http://www.lymenet.nl

Vastaa Viestiin